<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hiding from spammers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/</link>
	<description>The website of Kimmo Suominen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:43:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jani</title>
		<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-3116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/#comment-3116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve heard from other sources too that removing references to Wordpress may reduce spam. It&#039;s just been such a nightmare removing those from all the Wordpress installations I&#039;m runnig.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard from other sources too that removing references to WordPress may reduce spam. It&#8217;s just been such a nightmare removing those from all the WordPress installations I&#8217;m runnig.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this. I only just started up and I already had to delete loads of spam. I am looking at a few other measure to put in place but this should help to.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. I only just started up and I already had to delete loads of spam. I am looking at a few other measure to put in place but this should help to.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is my personal experience that not mentioning WordPress cuts down on the amount of incoming spam.  That is the main reason for this plugin.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, if you have &quot;Powered by WordPress&quot; on each page, it probably makes no difference whether you have the &lt;em&gt;generator&lt;/em&gt; meta tag or not.  Having WordPress mentioned in the content is enough to attract more spam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Knowing that a blog runs WordPress gives you information about how to attempt spamming.  You don&#039;t need to download the page HTML and parse it to find the comment form: it is often located in a &quot;standard&quot; address.  You can also use pingbacks and trackbacks without trying to find the URLs for these features (although e.g. pingbacks are advertised in a couple of easy-to-find ways, of course).  It seems that many spammers have tools especially crafted to target WordPress.  Naturally it makes sense, since WordPress is so popular.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, since I had already removed the &lt;em&gt;generator&lt;/em&gt; tag in the past, I just didn&#039;t want it back all of a sudden.  I try to avoid local modifications to the core WordPress code as much as possible, so all my mods become plugins instead.  Writing a plugin is not difficult at all, and one of the best design practices of WordPress is its multitude of hooks for plugins to use.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my personal experience that not mentioning WordPress cuts down on the amount of incoming spam.  That is the main reason for this plugin.</p>

<p>Of course, if you have &#8220;Powered by WordPress&#8221; on each page, it probably makes no difference whether you have the <em>generator</em> meta tag or not.  Having WordPress mentioned in the content is enough to attract more spam.</p>

<p>Knowing that a blog runs WordPress gives you information about how to attempt spamming.  You don&#8217;t need to download the page <acronym title="Hypertext Markup Language">HTML</acronym> and parse it to find the comment form: it is often located in a &#8220;standard&#8221; address.  You can also use pingbacks and trackbacks without trying to find the <acronym title="Uniform Resource Locator">URL</acronym>s for these features (although e.g. pingbacks are advertised in a couple of easy-to-find ways, of course).  It seems that many spammers have tools especially crafted to target WordPress.  Naturally it makes sense, since WordPress is so popular.</p>

<p>Also, since I had already removed the <em>generator</em> tag in the past, I just didn&#8217;t want it back all of a sudden.  I try to avoid local modifications to the core WordPress code as much as possible, so all my mods become plugins instead.  Writing a plugin is not difficult at all, and one of the best design practices of WordPress is its multitude of hooks for plugins to use.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin McNulty</title>
		<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This all sounds very interesting, but what you&#039;ve failed to do is explain exactly why I need a plugin the removes the Generator html?  You say it&#039;s a target for spam, but I don&#039;t really understand that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I stick &quot;powered by wordpress&quot; into Google, it claims to give me 12M hits.  So it seems to me that a generator meta tag isn&#039;t an issue with advertising that you run a wordpress blog.  Nor is it an indication that comments are enabled, or that your blog is somehow &quot;spammable&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having said all that, I&#039;m clearly missing something, as you would not have gone to the effort of writing a plugin that was meaningless.  So if you would be kind enough to explain, I would be much obliged.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all sounds very interesting, but what you&#8217;ve failed to do is explain exactly why I need a plugin the removes the Generator html?  You say it&#8217;s a target for spam, but I don&#8217;t really understand that.</p>

<p>If I stick &#8220;powered by wordpress&#8221; into Google, it claims to give me 12M hits.  So it seems to me that a generator meta tag isn&#8217;t an issue with advertising that you run a wordpress blog.  Nor is it an indication that comments are enabled, or that your blog is somehow &#8220;spammable&#8221;.</p>

<p>Having said all that, I&#8217;m clearly missing something, as you would not have gone to the effort of writing a plugin that was meaningless.  So if you would be kind enough to explain, I would be much obliged.</p>

<p>Many thanks,</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceredigion</title>
		<link>http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>ceredigion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimmo.suominen.com/archives/2007/12/hiding-from-spammers/#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I did this a while back but rather than remove it I just changed it completely, also changing things like &quot;add a comment&quot; to being images/ other phrases helps :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did this a while back but rather than remove it I just changed it completely, also changing things like &#8220;add a comment&#8221; to being images/ other phrases helps :D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

